[GushShalom] Report from Jenin; Avnery on polls + recommended ulrs

Gush Shalom (Israeli Peace Bloc) info at gush-shalom.org
Sat Jul 6 17:30:14 IDT 2002


GUSH SHALOM - pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033 - http://www.gush-shalom.org/

[1] International activists report from besieged Jenin hospital 
[2] Avnery on Opinion Polls 
[3] Recommended in Ha'aretz online
    (a) Gideon Levy: Buried with chocolate in his hand
    (b) Ze'ev Schiff: The dangers of a political vacuum
    (c) Aluf Benn: Ariel Sharon agrees to his own ideas 
    (d) Orly Halpern: Seminar 'dialogue on pain' opens path to understanding

[1] International activists report from besieged Jenin hospital 
------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	Huwaida Arraf <huwaidaa at yahoo.com>

July 6, 2002, 08:40
For immediate release
                      JENIN HOSPITAL UNDER SIEGE BY ISRAELI FORCES
                          International Activists at Hospital
[JENIN] International peace activists with the International Solidarity Movement report 
that at 4 AM Israeli tanks entered Jenin, occupied houses, and shot throughout the 
city. At 6 AM the tanks and soldiers surrounded the Jenin hospital and positioned 
snipers around the hospital. Ten tanks, three APCs and a number of jeeps are 
involved in this operation at the hospital. The hospital is now effectively closed by the 
military and a tight curfew is in effect for Jenin. 
Seven internationals are trying to escort civilians and provide a presence in each of the 
wards of the hospital. At around 6:30 AM this morning Caiomhe Butterly escorted one 
pregnant woman whose water had already broken and was about to give birth. On the 
way into the hospital, one soldier held his rifle to the woman's stomach and threatened 
to shoot. Only with the intervention of Caiomhe did the soldiers finally allow the 
woman entrance to the hospital. 
The Israeli soldiers allege there are armed men inside the hospital and have told the 
director of the hospital that the Israeli forces will remain until the Palestinians turn 
themselves in. The director of the hospital denies that any armed men are inside the 
hospital and has appealed for intervention to lift the siege on the hospital.
For more information in Jenin contact: 
Caiomhe Butterly – 055-975-374
Rebecca Murray – 055-558-954
Tobias Karlsson – 067-362-344
For more information on The International Solidarity Movement contact:
Huwaida Arraf – 052-642-709 or 067-473-308 
INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT
http://www.palsolidarity.org

[2] Avnery on Opinion Polls
------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	"Uri Avnery" <avnery at actcom.co.il>

Hi,
Hope this may shed some light on things.
Salamaat, Shalom,
uri

      A Maddened Cow
      Uri Avnery, 6.7.02

     Israel is the only state in the world that has a population of 200%. And that's a fact.
     Public opinion polls show that it has two simultaneous majorities. One is peace-
loving, the other supports extreme nationalism.
     At the present time, it looks like this: In every public opinion poll there is a large 
majority that supports the Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon. Sharon wants, of course, to 
enlarge the settlements, intensify the war against the Palestinians, eliminate Yasser 
Arafat, postpone a permanent solution and refuse any peace negotiations until 
unattainable conditions are met. Anyone who supports him must be a radical right-
winger.
     But the very same public opinion polls show also that a majority agrees to withdraw 
from (almost) all the occupied territories, dismantle (almost) all settlements and 
accept the establishment of a Palestinian state in return for peace.
     How is this possible? Can a state have a population of more than 100%? If so, 
Israel is a very special country.
     This curious situation did not come about yesterday. It started long ago.
     I remember public opinion polls of more than 20 tears ago, which also revealed two 
majorities. The first majority supported the idea of expelling all Arabs from the country 
west of the Jordan river. The second one supported a withdrawal from the West Bank 
and the Gaza Strip. Together with those who were against both proposals, this totaled 
200%.
     Statisticians and sociologists examined, researched, shook their collective heads, 
shrugged their shoulders, raised both hands and thought: a crazy people. Doesn't 
know what it wants. Mixed up. Schizophrenic. Suffering from a split personality.
     But the people were not mad at all. The professors just did not know how to read 
the results of their polls.
     What the public tried to say was: If it were possible to drive out all the Arabs, that 
would be wonderful. If it's impossible, let's get the hell out of there.
     Why? For a simple reason: the one thing that unifies almost all Jewish Israelis is 
the wish to live in a state where there are only Jews. If we could achieve such a state 
in all the country between the Mediterranean and the Jordan river, O.K. If not, let's 
leave the occupied territories. Not "land for peace", but "withdrawal for the sake of 
safeguarding a homogeneous Jewish state". This is the majority opinion, and there is, 
indeed, only one majority.
     Some call this "racist". Some call it "nationalist". Some say that this is 
"apartheid". But this attitude is rooted in the fact that for thousands of years Jews have 
lived as a religious-ethnic community dispersed throughout the world and often suffered 
cruel persecution (especially in the Christian world). They have developed a ghetto 
mentality. They want to live among themselves, separate from others, surrounded by a 
high fence.
     Zionism wanted to achieve this by establishing a state where the Jews would live 
together, without Goyim (Gentiles). Even the presence of a considerable minority (the 
Arab citizens) in Israel creates severe mental stress. For most Israelis, the ideal 
situation would be a state without a single non-Jewish citizen. (The presence of foreign 
workers does not bother anybody; it is temporary, and they are devoid of any rights.)
     Lately this aspiration has found new expression in an idea which is becoming quite 
popular: to transfer the Israeli Arab villages adjoining the West Bank, together with 
their inhabitants, to the future Palestinian state, which means giving up territory so that 
Israel will have less non-Jewish citizens.
     This is quite unusual. The French, for example, have shed rivers of blood in order to 
keep Alsace, whose people are of German descent. India is ready to wage a nuclear 
war in order to keep Kashmir, which is populated by Muslims. For other nations, 
territory is more important than a homogeneous population, geography precedes 
demography. Israelis, too, like territory - but demography is by far more important to 
them. 
     One example: after the 1956 war, during which Israel conquered the Sinai and the 
Gaza Strip, David Ben-Gurion was compelled to give up the Sinai. At the time there 
was a clamor from the right and the left to annex the Gaza Strip. Ben-Gurion 
adamantly refused, because he did not want to increase the number of Arab citizens 
by hundreds of thousands at any price. (The brilliant idea of an eternal military 
occupation, which allows the occupier to abstain from conferring citizenship on the 
occupied population, was not yet invented.)
     Today, too, there is only one majority in Israel. Most Israelis are ready to pay the 
price demanded for peace. So why do they support Sharon, who represents the 
opposite? For one simple reason: they have been brought to believe that "we have no 
partner". There is a complete unanimity, from Avigdor Liberman and Effy Eitam on the 
right to Haim Ramon and Yossi Sarid on the "left", that "there is no partner". And 
since there is no partner for peace, let's support Sharon, who knows (or so it seems) 
how to wage war. The aim of this brainwashing is precisely to make it possible to keep 
the occupied territories and, God willing, to drive the Palestinians out.
     The real criminal in this story is Ehud Barak. In order to hide his monumental 
failure as a peace-maker, he created the legend that "we offered them everything and 
they rejected everything." This historic lie is the connecting link between the two 
seemingly contradictory results of the polls: the majority is ready to pay the price of 
peace but does not believe that peace is possible. So let's support Sharon.
     There is no riddle here. Israel is not a mad cow. It is, at most, a maddened cow.


[3] Recommended in Ha'aretz online

(a) Gideon Levy: Buried with chocolate in his hand

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=182987&contrassID=2&
subContrassID=14&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y

(b) Ze'ev Schiff: The dangers of a political vacuum
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=183464&contrassID=2&
subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y

(c) Aluf Benn: Ariel Sharon agrees to his own ideas 
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=183743&displayTypeCd
=1&sideCd=1&contrassID=2

(d) Orly Halpern: Seminar 'dialogue on pain' opens path to understanding
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=183481&contrassID=2&subContrassID=
5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=183481

  ========================================
  Why are the volunteer international observers important?
  Because the United Nations don't send a protection force
  Information about the International Solidarity Movement 
       - and how to support it in different ways -
            at http://www.palsolidarity.org/
	      ==========================

	----
    Full transcript of the war crimes panel available on the Gush site
    For Hebrew   http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives/forum.html
    For English  http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives/forum_eng.html
    French available at request 
           
Also on the site:
    photo's - of action or otherwise informative 
    the weekly Gush Shalom ad - in Hebrew and English 
    the columns of Uri Avnery - in Hebrew, Arab and English	
    (and a lot more) 
		http://www.gush-shalom.org
 
In order to receive our Hebrew press releases [mostly WORD documents - not always same as 
English] mailto: gush-shalom-heb-request at mailman.gush-shalom.org + NB: write the word 
"subscribe" in the subject line.

If you want to support Gush Shalom's activities you can send a cheque or 
cash, wrapped well in an extra piece of paper, to: 

     Gush Shalom pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033

or ask us for charities in your country which receive donations on behalf of Gush Shalom

(Please, add your email address where to send our confirmation of receipt. 
 More official receipts at request only.)

For more about Gush Shalom  you are invited to visit our renewed website:
               http://www.gush-shalom.org/ 
              -\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-






                                                                                        




More information about the gush-shalom-intl mailing list