[Gush Shalom] Crumbling mantra - creeping annexation

[Gush Shalom (Israeli Peace Bloc)]

GUSH SHALOM - pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033 âåù ùìåí ú.ã. 3322 ú-à

àðâìéú òí ÷éùåøéí ìòáøéú

[] Avnery about the crumbling of the "No Partner" mantra
[] Creeping annexation contradicts goal of peace
  (Ha'aretz editorial June 18)

				%%%
    http://www.gush-shalom.org ôòéìåéåú öôåéåú áàúø 
				%%%

[] Avnery about the crumbling of the "No Partner" mantra

 :òáøéú / Hebrew:
http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives/article308_heb.html

Uri Avnery
19.6.04

			"Irreversible Mental Damage"

     Two weeks ago, the international community made a shocking 
declaration.
     Giving in to a demand by George Bush, the "Quartet" accepted the 
"Revised Disengagement Plan" of Ariel Sharon. This means that the United 
Nations, the European Union, the Russian Federation and the United States 
confirmed this document. I wonder if any one of the honorable diplomats 
has read the document with their own eyes.
     In the first paragraph of the "plan", the following words appear: 
"Israel has come to the conclusion that at present, there is no 
Palestinian partner with whom it is possible to make progress on a 
bilateral peace process."
     That is to say, the international community has confirmed that the 
Palestinian people has no right to take part in the determination of its 
own fate. Everything will be decided by the Government of Israel alone, 
with the backing of the United States, whose position will be 
automatically accepted by the other partners of the "Quartet". 
     The European Union with its 25 member-states, the government of the 
Russian Federation and the organization that represents the entire world 
have humbly accepted the edict of Bush, the dictator of the world, who is 
himself a captive of Sharon. Sharon decided long ago that the elected 
president of the Palestinian people is "irrelevant", together with the 
whole Palestinian leadership.
     The Palestinian people have been eliminated from the list of 
decision-makers, thereby also abolishing in practice all the agreements 
signed with them, from Oslo to the Road Map.
     This is a scandalous step, unprecedented in its dimensions, and it 
passed without comment. Apart from Sharon and his minions, nobody noticed 
the implications. The big boot of the international community trod on the 
Palestinian people without even noticing it, as if on an ant.
      That is the culmination of a process that began with the return of 
the then Prime minister, Ehud Barak, from the 2000 Camp David summit. 
After the failure of that meeting, he coined the mantra that has since 
become the cornerstone of the policy of successive Israeli governments: 
"I have turned every stone on the way to peace / I have offered the 
Palestinians more generous proposals than any of my predecessors / The 
Palestinians have rejected all my offers / Arafat wants to throw us into 
the sea / We have no partner for peace."
     This mantra is based on a series of lies that have been exploded 
long ago. American eye-witnesses like Rober Malley, President Clinton's 
advisor at Camp David, as well as some of the Israeli participants and 
international researchers have published detailed reports that prove that 
Barak himself was responsible for the failure at least as much as Arafat -
 in fact, far more.
     And as if by coincidence, just when the international community 
absent-mindedly accepted that the Palestinian people is not a partner for 
peace, in Israel itself things are happening that turn everything upside 
down.
     The High Priest of the "We Have No Partner" creed is General (res.) 
Amos Gilad, who at the crucial time was chief of the research section 
(and as such the No. 2) of the Army Intelligence Department. Since army 
intelligence is the department solely responsible for the "national 
security assessment", it has a decisive influence on the formation of 
national policy.
     The army intelligence man reports directly to the Prime Minister and 
takes part in cabinet meetings. No minister would dare to question his 
assessments, which are the guiding star of the entire state. The research 
chief of the intelligence department is supposed to submit a professional 
summary of the huge amount of data amassed by the intelligence community. 
Most ministers are forbidden to read the written report, and even the few 
others are allowed only to glance at it. Therefore, the oral summary 
presented by the chief of research to the Prime Minister and the cabinet 
is of paramount importance.
     Amos Gilad went even further: he appeared almost daily in the media, 
commenting on almost every political and security event. He was not only 
the "national assessor", but also the "national explainer", as he was 
commonly called in the media.
     Who is this man, who has had a greater influence than any other 
person on the policies of Israel over the last few crucial years, and 
whose kontsepsia (Hebrew for "conception") is still directing the path of 
the state? This is the very same Amos Gilad who some days ago claimed for 
himself the benefits due to disabled army veterans. He was not wounded in 
battle, God forbid, but claimed that the stress caused by his difficult 
job has inflicted on him irreversible mental damage.
    This claim involves a considerable amount of Chutzpah, if not worse. 
But it also raises the question: This mental damage, when did it start? 
When were the first symptoms observed? Was it when he started endlessly 
repeating that Arafat wants to throw us into the sea? Or was this 
declaration, perhaps, itself a symptom of his mental problem? And how can 
he continue to fulfil his present duties?
    The last two weeks, Israel witnessed a stormy debate that should have 
shaken the very foundations of the state.
     The former chief of Army Intelligence, General (res.) Amos Malka, 
who was the direct superior of Gilad, broke his silence of many years and 
published a thunderous accusation: that Amos Gilad arrived at his 
"kontseptsia" without any intelligence basis whatsoever. On the contrary, 
the huge amount of information collected by the intelligence department 
indicated the very opposite. That is to say, Gilad freely invented his 
intelligence reports, based on his political views and/or on the desire 
to please his political bosses, Barak and Sharon.
      This grave accusation raised a storm in professional circles. 
Intelligence operatives of undoubted integrity emerged from their 
anonymity in order to support Malka publicly. They were headed by the man 
who, at the relevant time, was in charge of the Army Intelligence section 
for Palestinian affairs, Colonel Ephraim Lavie, who was then responsible 
for the collection of all intelligence material about the Palestinian 
leadership. There is no doubt that in the professional confrontation 
between Amos and Amos, Amos Malka emerged as the victor.
     This means, in simple words: there was no intelligence material at 
all backing the assertion that Arafat is working for the destruction of 
the State of Israel, that Arafat had broken off the peace process in 
order to start a terror campaign, that Arafat is not ready for a 
reasonable compromise. All these assertions, uttered by diverse Israeli 
politicians and generals, were based on the "assessment" of one man who, 
while appearing to represent the intelligence department, was actually 
suppressing the considered professional reports of his own department, as 
well as of the General Security Service (Shabak).
      When the debate heated up, the orientalist Matti Steinberg, a 
former advisor on Palestinian affairs to the chief of the Shabak, joined 
the fray. Steinberg not only confirmed that Gilad's "kontseptsia" was 
completely false and contradicted the intelligence material assembled by 
his own people, but he also asserted that Gilad's conception "fulfilled 
its own prophecy".
     Since Israel is immeasurably stronger than the Palestinians, its 
actions create reality. The acts guided by Gilad's "kopntseptsia" created 
results that suited it. Much as the "kontseptsia" of Eli Za'ira, the 
intelligence chief at the time of the Yom Kippur war, resulted in 
catastrophe, thus the "kontseptsia" of Amos Gilad caused - and is still 
causing - the disasters of the present intifada. 
     (The 1973 intelligence conception was that Egypt would not dare to 
attack Israel, causing all the glaringly obvious signs to the contrary to 
be ignored, thus preventing adequate preparations and resulting in the 
death of 3000 Israeli soldiers. Since than the Hebrew word "kontseptsia" 
has assumed an almost obscene connotation in Israel.)      
     As of now, Gilad's immediate superior (Malka) and his immediate 
subordinate (Lavie) both accuse him of presenting his personal opinions, 
which were unsupported by any intelligence backing, as if they were the 
official assessment of the intelligence services.
     Gilad has caused irreversible damage. His mantra was accepted by the 
vast majority of Israelis, as well as a large part of international 
public opinion. Its exposure in professional circles will not alter this 
fact. Indeed, the recent decision of the "Quartet" shows how deeply 
entrenched this lie has become throughout the world.
     By the way, these revelations show that the secret assessment of the 
highest professional echelons of the Army Intelligence Department and 
Shabak were practically identical with the assessments published at the 
time by Gush Shalom, which were met with total disbelief by the media and 
the public, including a large part of the "peace camp". To wit, that the 
Palestinian leadership, headed by Arafat, has never wavered from its 
readiness to make peace with Israel based on the creation of a 
Palestinian state on 97% of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (which 
together make 22% of historic Palestine), with territorial compensation 
for the remaining 3% and sovereignty over East Jerusalem and the Haram-al-
Sharif ("Temple Mount"). The refugee problem would be solved by agreement 
with Israel (meaning: Israel will have a veto on any solution). 
     The experts of army intelligence and the security service, too, 
agree that Arafat has not wavered from this position. On this basis, 
peace can be achieved even now, as Arafat himself confirmed this week in 
a fascinating interview with the new editor of Haaretz, David Landau.
     Ariel Sharon denies this, of course, because he is not ready for 
peace on these terms. He wants to annex at least 55% of the West Bank, 
hoping that the life of the Palestinians in the remaining 45% will become 
so impossible that they will leave the country of their own accord. 
Shimon Peres is eager to help him in the realization of this design.
     For that, Sharon needs the "We Have No Partner" mantra. Amos Gilad 
delivered the goods. Now the "Quartet" has accepted it, bringing shame on 
itself and obstructing the search for peace.     
				%%%

[] Creeping annexation contradicts goal of peace
   (Ha'aretz editorial June 18)

 <http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/440541.html>
 :òáøéú / Hebrew:
 <http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArtPE.jhtml?itemNo=440734>
 
No safety net for annexation  

The vocabulary of Hebrew is expanding as successive Israeli governments 
try to cloud their intentions regarding construction in the West Bank - 
or, more accurately, their evasion of their obligations. The word 
mifredet (separator), for instance, will now describe the wall to be 
built the length of Route 60, which is the main transportation artery for 
Jerusalem's northern neighborhoods, and the expressions "fingernails" and 
"fingers" will from now on be the metaphors for a system of creeping 
construction of the fence around Ariel. Under cover of these `clean' 
expressions, a plan for the de facto annexation of some 150 square 
kilometers in the heart of the northern West Bank - including Ariel, 
Immanuel, Karnei Shomron, Kedumim and other settlements - is being 
implemented. 
 
  
This plan does not accord with Israel's promises to the American 
administration, which state that the fence in the Ariel area will remain 
open on the western side, thereby preventing even the appearance of 
annexation. But this is not only a gross breach of promise, which joins 
the failure to fulfill other road map commitments such as dismantling 
illegal settlement outposts or halting construction in the settlements. 
The constant, creeping annexation by Israel of land in the West Bank 
under the pretext of building the separation fence also constitutes a 
unilateral determination of the border, which contradicts the goal of 
reaching an agreement by mutual consent.

The idea of a separation fence enjoys broad public support because it 
promises to reduce the number of terror attacks inside Israel. But Prime 
Minister Ariel Sharon's government distorted this basic intention and 
turned the fence into a tool of ideology, thereby sparking numerous 
international denunciations. Now that Sharon has announced his plan for a 
unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, it appears that he is trying 
to "compensate" for the loss of Gaza by a rapid annexation of parts of 
the West Bank. He thereby confirms the suspicion that the withdrawal from 
Gaza is aimed not at facilitating a comprehensive peace agreement, but at 
unilaterally legitimizing the annexation of parts of the West Bank.

In the face of this clear intention, the silence that has descended on 
the Labor Party is extremely puzzling. This party, which rightly promised 
Sharon a safety net for his plan to exit Gaza, has apparently lost its 
ability to distinguish between a safety net and criticism of a diplomatic 
mistake. It is possible that the chance of joining the Sharon government 
has somewhat addled the minds of the party's leaders; it is inexplicable 
that a party whose principal policy plank is a peace agreement, and that 
supports withdrawal, would lend its support, even by turning a blind eye, 
to a clear policy of annexation.

The Labor Party remains the ideological alternative to the Likud. As the 
provider of a safety net, it has the ability to oppose the creeping 
annexation that Sharon is currently carrying out, and it must stand by 
its belief. The safety net that it is prepared to give Sharon cannot 
replace oversight, criticism and the drawing of red lines.  

 				%%%

          
#  U.S citizens who want to alert their representatives about 
   increased  settlement  expansion on the West Bank which 
   is happening RIGHT NOW can do so easily at: 
   http://www.cflweb.org/congress_merge_.htm 

# Photos + report of June 16 A-Ram protest against the Wall

  The press conference + start of women's demo
  http://www.gush-shalom.org
  http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html

  Photos of the following women's protest march
  http://share.shutterfly.com/os.jsp?i=EeANWjlw2csWzqg&open=1

# The "Breaking the Silence" soldiers' exhibition continues in Tel Aviv   
  (until June   25th) link for details [in Hebrew ]:
   http://www.shovrimshtika.org/hebrew/
   and in English: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/440348.html

# Arna's Children June schedule at:
  http://www.arna.info/Arna/movie.php?lang=heb

# Truth against Truth - opposite views on the history of the conflict
  in 101 steps 

# Video footage of mass uprooting of olive trees 
  and the women's resistance in Az Zawiya, June 7 
  and of resistance at Salfit against the construction of the monster Wall
  available at:

  http://www.womenspeacepalestine.org/news8junazzawiya.htm
  http://www.iwps-pal.org/ftpiwps/videos/salfit_june_17.rmvb
  (International Womens' Peace Service - IWPS)


# Palestinians draw the map for understanding the Disengagement Plan
  http://www.nad-plo.org/images/maps/pdf/gaza.pdf


Hebrew / òáøéú
http://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Heb.pdf

English
http://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Eng.pdf


# Boycott List of Settlement Products (newly updated)
   
Hebrew / òáøéú
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boycheb.htm

English
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boyceng.htm


# Refusniks 

Constantly-updated refusniks lists:

English - http://www.yesh-gvul.org/english/prison/
Hebrew / òáøéú - http://www.yesh-gvul.org/prison/

English - http://www.newprofile.org/default.asp?language=en
Hebrew / òáøéú - http://www.newprofile.org/

Help us free our children from the military prison! (parents of The Five)
          For ENGLISH details please click 
http://www.refuz.org.il/help.html 
          For HEBREW please click 
http://www.refuz.org.il/hebrew/help.html 
          Homepage with lots of information: 
http://www.refuz.org.il/

# Eye-witness reports from the Occupied Territories:
 
http://www.machsomwatch.org 
  (Israeli women monitoring the checkpoints)
http://www.palsolidarity.org/pressreleases/pressreleases.php
  (internationals throughout OT)

--
http://www.gush-shalom.org/ (òáøéú/Hebrew)
http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html (English)
http://www.gush-shalom.org/arabic/index.html (selected articles in Arabic)

with
\\photos of recent actions 
\\the weekly Gush Shalom ad 
\\the columns of Uri Avnery 
\\Gush Shalom's history & action chronicle  
\\position papers & analysis (in "documents")
\\and a lot more

N.B.: 
On the Gush Shalom website links for 
Articles and documents in German, French and Spanish

In order to receive Gush Shalom's Hebrew-language 
press releases mail to:
gush-shalom-heb-request at mailman.gush-shalom.org 
+ NB: write the word "subscribe" in the subject line.

Archive of email reports:
https://mailman.gush-shalom.org/pipermail/gush-
shalom/2004/thread.html#start

If you want to support Gush Shalom's activities you can 
send a cheque or cash, wrapped well in an extra piece 
of paper to: 

Gush Shalom
pob 3322
Tel-Aviv 61033
Israel

or ask us for charities in your country which receive 
donations on behalf of Gush Shalom

Please, add your email address where to send our 
confirmation of receipt. More official receipts at 
request only.