Avnery on the Hague court/Ben Artzi appeal/soldiers break the silence

[Gush Shalom]

GUSH SHALOM - pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033 www.gush-shalom.org/

International release, July 11, 2004

[] Uri Avnery -There are Judges in The Hague
[] Gila Svirsky: Thank you, your honors...   
[] Military Court of Appeals Hears Jonathan Ben-Artzi's Case
[] Refusnik Reservist Chaim Feldman to be imprisoned tomorrow  
[] Breaking the Silence – soldiers' testimonies from the Territories

                ~~~

[] Uri Avnery -There are Judges in The Hague

ðåñç òáøé áàúø âåù ùìåí

 www.gush-shalom.org
                                                                        

			There are Judges in The Hague

Uri Avnery
10.7.04
One of the Israeli newspapers, Haaretz, put the two events on the front page: the 100th anniversary
 of the death of Theodor Herzl, 
the founder of the modern Zionist movement, and the judgement of the International Court of Justice
, which declared the Israeli 
Separation Wall illegal. This coincidence may seem fortuitous. What connection could there possibly
 be between a historical 
anniversary and the latest topical event?

But there is a connection. It is expressed in one sentence written by Herzl in Der Judenstaat, the 
book that became the 
cornerstone of Zionism. This is what it said: "There (in Palestine) we shall be a sector of the wal
l of Europe against Asia, 
we shall serve as the outpost of civilization against barbarism." 

This sentence could easily be written today. American thinkers propound the "clash of civilizations
", with Western 
"Judeo-Christian" culture battling "Islamic barbarism". American leaders declare that Israel is the
 outpost of Western 
civilization in the fight against Arab-Muslim "international terrorism". 

The Sharon government is building a wall for the purpose, or so it says, of protecting Israel again
st Palestinian-Arab 
terrorism. It declares at every opportunity that the fight against "Palestinian terrorism" is a par
t of the struggle 
against "international terrorism". The Americans support the Israeli wall with all their heart and 
their wallet.

Even the semi-official name of the barrier - the "Separation Fence" - emphasizes this tendency.  It
 is intended to 
"separate" between nations, between civilizations, and indeed to separate culture (us) from barbari
sm (them). 

These are profoundly ideological reasons, mostly unconscious, for the building of the wall. On the 
surface, 
it seems to be a practical response to a real and present danger. 

An ordinary Israeli will say: "Are you nuts? What are you talking about? What has this to do with H
erzl? 
He died a hundred years ago!" But there is a direct connection. This is also true for another aspec
t of the wall. 
In Herzl's day a phrase was coined that became the slogan of the Zionist movement in its early year
s: 
"A land without a people for a people without a land." That is to say, Palestine is an empty countr
y.

Anyone who tours the length of the planned path of the wall is struck by one aspect that leaps to t
he eye: 
it has been determined without the slightest consideration for the life of the Palestinian human be
ings 
living there. The wall crushes them as a man steps on an ant. Farmers are cut off from their fields
, 
workers from the workplaces, pupils from their schools, sick people from their hospitals, the berea
ved 
from the graves of their beloved ones.

It is easy to imagine the officers and settlers bent over the map and planning the path - as though
 through 
an empty space, with nothing there except settlements, army bases and roads. They argue about topog
raphy, 
tactical considerations and strategic objectives. Palestinians? What Palestinians?

The Israeli Supreme Court that handed down its decision last week concentrated mainly on this point
. 
It did not contest the generals' pronouncement that the wall is necessary. If the generals say so, 

the court stands to attention and salutes. Neither did the court decide that the wall must be built
 
on the Green Line, the internationally recognized border between Israel and the territories it occu
pied 
in 1967, which is also the shortest and most easily defended line. But it recognized the fact that 
the 
territories contain a Palestinian population and demanded that their human requirements be taken in
to consideration.

During the week that has passed since then, it became clear that the army is ready to make some cha
nges to the path 
of the wall, but not to change its basic concept. The "improved" path still creates enclaves for th
e Palestinians and 
limits their freedom of movement, if less than the former path. Some of the farmers will be reconne
cted with their 
land. Nothing more.

Now comes the International Court of Justice and announces principles that are much closer to those
 supported by the 
Israeli peace forces that have demonstrated against the wall. It says that the wall itself is illeg
al, except where 
it follows the Green Line. All the sectors built inside the occupied territories violate internatio
nal law as well as 
conventions and agreements signed by Israel.

The court says that those sectors of the wall must be removed, the situation restored to what it wa
s before, and the 
Palestinian compensated for the damage inflicted on them. All the countries of the world are called
 upon to abstain 
from giving any aid to the building of the wall.

Will this have any impact on Israeli public opinion? I am afraid not. During the last few months, t
he official propaganda 
machine has been preparing the public for this day. The judges of the International Court, it was s
aid, are anti-Semites. 
It is well known that all the nations, with the possible exception of the United States, want to de
stroy the Jewish State. 
Some years ago a jolly song was very popular: "All the world is against us / But we don't give a da
mn
" So, to hell with them!

Will it have an impact on world public opinion? Probably, though the court's "advisory opinion" is 
not binding and the 
court has no army or police to enforce its decisions. There is no point in submitting it to the Sec
urity Council, where 
it will automatically be shot down by an American veto. At any time, and even more so on the eve of
 elections, an American 
administration will be loath to offend the pro-Israeli lobby, both Jewish and Evangelical. The US w
ill ignore the court 
and go on financing the wall.

But in the veto-free UN General Assembly there will be a wide-ranging debate that will shine a spot
light on the real 
character of the wall. The propaganda machine of the Sharon government, aided and abetted by most o
f the world's media, 
has produced an image of the wall as a necessary means for the prevention of suicide attacks inside
 Israel. The debate 
in the General Assembly may help to publicize the real purpose of the monster.

The day before the judgement I was in a big tent at A-Ram, just north of Jerusalem, a town that is 
one of the principal 
victims of the wall. A hunger strike of Palestinians and Israelis against the wall has been taking 
place there. The place 
has attracted pilgrims from all over the country. 

Inside the tent, the world premiere of a film took place. Its director, Simone Bitton, an Israeli o
f North African 
origin living in Paris, shows the wall as it is.

In the film, Palestinians describe what the wall has done to them. A Jewish Kibbutz member calls it
 a disaster for Israel, 
a disaster of our own making. The Director of the Ministry of Defense, General Amos Yaron (who was 
relieved of his army 
command by the Kahan Inquiry Commission for his involvement in the Sabra and Shatila affair) explai
ns that the Palestinians 
themselves are to blame for their suffering. After all, if they just stopped resisting the occupati
on, there would be no need 
for the wall.

But the most moving sequence of the film was purely visual, a sequence without words. One sees gree
n fields and olive groves 
stretching to the horizon, and occasional villages with their soaring minarets. A crane lifts a hug
e concrete slab into place 
on the wall. It hides a part of the landscape. A second slab is raised and hides some more. The thi
rd slab blocks the landscape 
entirely - and you realize that before your very eyes, another village has been cut off from life f
orever, with the huge, 
8-meter-high wall enclosing the village from all sides.

But at the same moment a thought crossed my mind: After all, the same crane that puts the blocks th
ere can also remove them. 
It happened in Germany. It will happen here. The decision of the judges of The Hague, coming from 1
5 different countries, 
has made a contribution to that.

Perhaps it is an irony of history: the judges who represent European culture demand that the wall b
e removed. If Herzl 
had witnessed that, he would have been puzzled.

[] Gila Svirsky: Thank you, your honors...   

From:           	Gila Svirsky <gsvirsky at netvision.net.il>


Thank You, Your Honors
Gila Svirsky

In a carefully reasoned but unequivocal decision, the International Court of Justice in the Hague d
id the expected: 
It found that Israel's construction of its security wall inside Palestinian territory is illegal ac
cording to international law.

As an Israeli deeply concerned about the security of my country, and a Jew deeply concerned about t
he moral implications of building 
this barrier, I applaud this decision.

Israel's security claims in favor of the wall are seriously flawed: As it is now being constructed
, the wall does not follow the 
1967 border, but rather reaches deep into Palestinian land, a route that will ultimately leave hund
reds of thousands of Palestinians 
on the Israeli side. How will this prevent Palestinian suicide bombers from entering Israel?

On humanitarian grounds, the wall is unconscionable. It prevents Palestinian access to farmland, s
chools, hospitals and jobs. 
Picture your children having to wait at the wall twice a day for soldiers to show up and unlock the
 gate, allowing them to get to 
and from school. Picture the farmer who made a living from his olive trees, which are now inaccess
ible or have been felled to make 
way for construction. Imagine that you suddenly need to see a doctor, but have no permit to get th
rough. Imagine that you simply 
want to visit your elderly mother, but the wall now comes between you. According to B'Tselem, the 
Israeli human rights organization, 
when the wall is complete, some 38% of Palestinians will find their lives disrupted and their livel
ihoods discontinued.

The presence of the wall is not only cruel to Palestinians; it will ultimately harm Israeli securit
y as well, as it intensifies 
the bitterness and hatred directed toward us. Is this the security that the wall will provide?

Unlike Palestinians who can hardly avoid it, most Israelis have never even seen the wall; it is bui
lt inside Palestinian 
territory, where only Israeli settlers (and the soldiers sent to protect them) now venture. If oth
er Israelis saw it, I hope 
they would be shocked. In several places, the wall does not simply wend through Palestinian towns,
 it actually surrounds them 
entirely, penning the residents inside - their right to enter or leave left to the whim of young so
ldiers guarding the gate.

In these localities, civilian populations are now entirely encircled by a 30-foot-high, gray concre
te battlement interrupted 
only by watchtowers from where soldiers train binoculars and automatic rifles on the residents belo
w. Lights mounted on the 
wall shine down into the streets, making constant surveillance that much easier. As a Jew whose an
cestors were confined to 
ghettoes during anti-Semitic periods of history, I find this horrifying. Will keeping 100,000 Pale
stinians penned in ghettoes 
and enclaves serve the security needs of Israel? Did forcing Jews into the ghettoes of Europe serv
e the security needs of 
those countries?

Last week, the Israeli Supreme Court acknowledged the grave violations of Palestinian human rights 
resulting from the wall, 
and ordered the army to reroute it in specific locations. While our government is hoping that this
 Israeli court ruling will 
make it possible for Israel to ignore the Hague tribunal - on the grounds that "the wall is an inte
rnal security matter that we 
are dealing with" - most Israeli peace activists do not agree. Construction of the wall within Occ
upied Territory - meaning on 
somebody else's property - is a violation of basic rights, no matter how you look at it. And claim
s that the wall provides 
security are undercut by the large numbers of Palestinians who will remain on the "Israeli" side.

Ultimately, the best way for my country to achieve security is to negotiate peace with the Palestin
ians, and sufficiently 
improve the lives on both sides so that there is a vested interest in maintaining the peace. The w
all, however, does just 
the opposite. As a result, it is not only bad for Palestine, but bad for Israel too.

A few days ago, I watched an old Palestinian woman surveying with dismay her family's olive trees t
hat the army had cut down, 
shaving a swath on which the wall will rise. "Those stupid people," she said, careful not to name 
them, "If not for their 
stupidity, we could have lived in peace with each other."

____________________
Gila Svirsky is a peace and human rights activist in Jerusalem.

Coalition of Women for Peace
www.coalitionofwomen4peace.org

[] Military Court of Appeals Hears Jonathan Ben-Artzi's Case

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	Matania Ben-Artzi <mbartzi at yahoo.com>

Pacifist Jonathan (Yoni) Ben-Artzi's struggle reached a new level on July 9, 2004, when his case ca
me in front of an extended panel of five judges in 
the Military Court of Appeals in Tel Aviv. Among the judges were four Major-Generals, including a f
ormer commander of Israel's Central command, a 
former head of military personnel, and the former and current Presidents of the Court of Appeals. 


Yoni has spent nearly two years in military jail and detention, until the army decided to release h
im for "incompatibility due to lack of 
motivation".  However, his Court Martial process hasn't  ended. He has appealed his "technical" con
viction by a lower military court (for refusing to 
enlist) and his sentencing (in April 2004) to two additional months in jail and 2000 NIS (or two mo
re jail months).

At the appeal hearing, the prosecution no longer claimed, as it did in the lower court, that Yoni i
s not a pacifist. Indeed, such a claim would be 
difficult to defend, given the scandalous testimony of the head of the army's "conscience committee
", and the lower court's subsequent ruling that 
effectively recognized Yoni as a pacifist. The military prosecutor, who laced his arguments with en
dless contempt for pacifists, argued that even if 
the army should have recognized Yoni as a pacifist, and even if the law exempted him from military 
service, he should have still obeyed the order to 
enlist, and should thus be convicted. At times, the prosecutor, flustered by relentless questioning
 by the judges, seemed to have a personal vendetta 
against Yoni, and the entire court seemed amused by his high-pitched ranting. Among many "pearls of
 wisdom", he said that Yoni decided to become a 
pacifist because it is "sexy" (as compared to dodging the service on "psychological" grounds).

Defense lawyer Adv. Michael Sfard, a prominent human rights lawyer in Israel, compared Yoni's situa
tion with that of Antigone, the heroine of 
Sophocles' tragedy. He said that, as a pacifist, Yoni could not obey the order, which was itself il
legal and contradictory to basic justice. He could 
simply not have acted otherwise.

As for the judges – they seemed genuinely troubled by the petty nature of the prosecution's argumen
ts, and by the scandalous nature of the 
"conscience committee". The Court's President, Maj.-General Yishai Bar, asked the skull-cap wearing
 prosecutor, whether a religious Jew, who receives 
an order to eat pork, and refuses, should be convicted. The prosecutor did not answer. When the pro
secutor stated that Israel views negatively the 
idea of pacifism, Maj.-General Bar asked if this applied also to the Biblical Prophets' vision. The
 prosecutor's reply was that this was a scenario 
for the latter days. Maj.-General Gideon Sheffer, former head of military personnel, and current he
ad of a committee exploring the issue of civil 
service, commented on the lack of such an alternative to  military service in Israel. In the unlike
ly event, that Bar, Sheffer and their fellow 
judges, in a show of public and judicial courage, offer Yoni an alternative civilian service, it wo
uld be a major milestone in the struggle against 
militarism in this country.

[] Refusnik Reservist Chaim Feldman to be imprisoned tomorrow  

From:           	Ram Rahat,Yesh-Gvul <rahat at bezeqint.net>
                                                                        
èëñè áòáøéú îï äùåìç äî÷åøé 

A Letter to a Liaison Officer
Chaim Feldman is a combat reservist. He was jailed for 21 days last year for refusing to serve 
the occupation. I it is very likely that tomorrow (Monday July 12) he will be jailed again. This le
tter to his unit's liaison officer explains why:
To Second Lt. Adi Boneh, Liaison Officer, Unit 02043
Shalom,
My message is brief and clear - I have no intention of wearing the uniform of the so-called Israeli
 Defence Forces, and will not serve it in any 
capacity. I won't be connected to an organization that fires tank shells into a crowd of human bein
gs that includes children and adults. I won't be 
connected to an organization that builds a crude and racist concrete wall that separates simple peo
ple from their work, their fields, their football 
pitch and even from their cemetery.
I won't be connected to an organization that defends the fascist law-breaking settlers who cut down
 and burn olive groves, attack children, damage 
property and humiliate normal people.
I simply won't be attached to an organization that commits crimes.
The IDF should have remained a small, dynamic army, but in fact the state turned it into a monster;
 for this state is alienating itself from its 
neighbors in the Middle East by building racist apartheid walls in order to rabidly protect its shi
tty Jewish character! 
By so doing it tramples the amazing potential for co-existence with the Arab people, a people who a
re no less talented or good than the Jews. Just 
imagine what a wonderful country this could be if we only got closer to them and if we all learned 
to speak Arabic before English. But no, we didn't 
learn the big lesson of the holocaust. We continue to hate and we still isolate ourselves within ou
r Polish ghetto.
All my actions are geared to a real peace, between all the people who dwell here, and between the p
eople and our environment. This is the real 
service that I have to do here in Israel, and if people would use their energy on this, and not on 
the army, this would have been a better place long 
ago.
Now, in July 2004, I am coordinating the struggle against the Trans-Israel Highway, which threatens
 to destroy the Menashe Heights. Our tent was put 
up amongst the olive groves and peach orchards of the Kapher Kara'a village, where the trees are fa
ted to be uprooted. In addition I have been active 
in the struggle against the terrible Apartheid wall which threatens to raise up more hatred against
 us from the ranks of the Palestinians and the 
Israeli Arabs. 
In the impoverished camps of the Palestinians some other good souls and I are trying to help set up
 gardens and farm plots for food for the 
villagers. In addition I have to help support my unemployed parents and be responsible for the upke
ep of our home, so please release from this 
criminal burden. I have no intention of lowering my military Fitness Profile [a common method of ge
tting discharge from miltary service and avoiding 
imprisonment. ed.] . I am a combatant and proud of what I am - and now my real battle is for peace 
between the people and with the land.
Even if you decide to send me to prison for two years, I will refuse. I have no regrets. Anything i
s better than being a criminal in IDF clothes.
Thank you,
Chaim Feldman
If Chaim is jailed tomorrow  he will join:
Reservists
Eldar Kirsh, 25, a student who was sentenced to 25 days at Prison 4 this past Monday.
Matan Koren, a student who was sentenced to 28 days at Prison 6 on June 30th.
Eitan Lerner,41, Feldenkreiss teacher, sentenced to 28 days at prison 6.
Draftees
Daniel Tzal, Adam Maor, Naom Bahat, Shimri Zameret, Matan Kaminer and Haggai Matar
In their honour Yesh Gvul is holding a Solidarity Vigil at Prison 6 (Athlit) next Saturday, July 17
th, 2004 at 12:30pm. 
(Transport details will be announced during the week.)


[] Breaking the Silence – soldiers' testimonies from the Territories
from:         yehuda at shovrimshtika.org
èëñè áòáøéú îï äùåìç äî÷åøé 

Last week, the exhibition of photographs and testimonies “Breaking the Silence – Fighters Tell abou
t Hebron” closed, after being on display during 
June at the Gallery of Geographic Photography in Yad Eliahu, Tel Aviv. During the month, over 6,00
0 visitors came to the exhibition, from all over 
the country; many themselves were soldiers, many of those soldiers brought their families with the
m, and at the exhibition told their families what 
they felt and what they do during their own military service. 
The exhibition became an unending gallery discussion during which not only did we talk about how we
 felt and what we had done in our military 
service, but also man y of the visitors to the exhibition decided to break their own silence and be
gan to talk. We heard from many about experiences 
they had undergone which were similar to ours. From many others, we also heard of different things
, tough experiences, things we found unbelievable, 
things that require checking, investigation and exposure. 
We understood that what we had displayed at the exhibition about our Hebron experience was only the
 tip of the iceberg – most of which is still 
hidden from view. We understood then that an opportunity has fallen into our laps – the right to b
reak a small tip of that iceberg, to break the 
silence.
Amongst visitors to the gallery were people who expressed their wish to give witness about things t
hey had seen, things that happened in their 
presence, things they were part of, things they initiated and carried out. Dozens of soldiers deci
ded after their visit to the exhibition to 
writenew testimonies about some of the situations they had been in during their military service: 
situations they felt should be brought to the 
attention of the Israeli public. We understood that we had opened a crack in the door
 
We understood that our role was not over, we understood that we had to continue, to listen and reco
rd what these soldiers have to say, and put all 
this material together and expose i t to our fellow Israeli citizens. We understood it is our duty
 to discuss in our homes what happens there, in 
the occupied territories.
Breaking the Silence is moving on, into its next stage. At the exhibition, we concentrated on Heb
ron. We are now opening “Breaking the Silence” to 
all.
IF YOU SERVED IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES DURING THE PAST FOUR YEARS, AND 
YOU WISH TO BREAK YOUR SILENCE, WE ARE HERE FOR YOU.
www.shovrimshtika.org
In our intention to open the crack of the door wider, through which the Israeli public will receive
 information about what their sons and daughters 
do during their military service in the Occupied Territories, all of which we are undertaking with 
care to safeguard both the confidentiality and the 
identities of the soldiers who decide to break the silence, as we did at the exhibition.
During the coming months we intend to cover the whole country, to gather more testimonies from figh
ters about their military service in the Occupied 
Territories; these testimonies we intend to display on our website: www.shovrimshtika.org and thro
ugh the media 
(very soon we shall be publishing the testimonies we collected during the course of the exhibition)
. We intend to take the exhibition to exhibition 
spaces outside the centre of the country. To set up meetings and discussions at youth clubs, schoo
ls, universities and private houses. To set up 
frameworks where fighters who are interested can break the silence.
We learnt something else during the exhibition. “Breaking the Silence” exhausted our bank account.
 To set in motion the work programme we have set 
ourselves during the coming months, we need your help. Your help is important to us, not only in o
rder to fund our activities, but also in order to 
receive the support and encouragement which it is in your hands to give.
In order to give a testimony, contact: yehuda at shovrimshtika.org or leave a message at: 068-454725

To arrange meetings and gatherings in public halls as well as in private housesleave message at: 06
8-454725
Or: www.shovrimshtika.org 
                                   
For contributions: Bank Hapoalim, Account Number 315451, Branch 608
Cheques should be made out to “Breaking the Silence” and may also be posted to 
POB 68150, Jerusalem 91681.
The website address (still in the process of being designed): www.shovrimshtika.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
 
# Truth against Truth - opposite views on the history of the conflict
 in 101 steps 

Hebrew / òáøéúhttp://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Heb.pdfEnglishhttp://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Eng.pdf# Palestinians draw the map for understanding the Disengagement Plan
 http://www.nad-plo.org/images/maps/pdf/gaza.pdf
# Boycott List of Settlement Products (newly updated) 
Hebrew / òáøéúhttp://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boycheb.htmEnglishhttp://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boyceng.htm# Eye-witness reports from the Occupied Territories:
 
http://www.machsomwatch.org 
 (Israeli women monitoring the checkpoints)http://www.palsolidarity.org/pressreleases/pressreleases.php (internationals throughout OT) - films, expositions, refusnik links  \/# The "Breaking the Silence" sold
iers' exhibition  
 photo gallery at:
 <http://www.shovrimshtika.org/hebrew/modules.php?name=coppermine> stories (Hebrew only) <http://www.shovrimshtika.org/hebrew/modules.php?name=News>
 article in English: <http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/440348.html>

# Refusniks Constantly-updated refusniks lists:
English - http://www.yesh-gvul.org/english/prison/
Hebrew / òáøéú - http://www.yesh-gvul.org/prison/

English - http://www.newprofile.org/default.asp?language=en
Hebrew / òáøéú - http://www.newprofile.org/

Help us free our children from the military prison! (parents of The
Five)
 For ENGLISH details please clickhttp://www.refuz.org.il/help.html  For HEBREW please clickhttp://www.refuz.org.il/hebrew/help.html Homepage with lots of information: http://www.refuz.org.il
/-- Gush Shalom website, how to donate /
 subscrie to emails etc.:

http://www.gush-shalom.org/ (òáøéú/Hebrew)
http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html (English)http://www.gush-shalom.org/arabic/index.html (selected articles inArabic)with\\photos of recent actions \\the weekly Gush Shalom ad \\the columns of Uri Avnery 
\\Gush Shalom's history & action chronicle \\position papers & analysis (in "documents")\\and a lot more

N.B.: 
On the Gush Shalom website links for 
Articles and documents in German, French and Spanish

In order to receive Gush Shalom's Hebrew-language 
press releases mail to:
gush-shalom-heb-request at mailman.gush-shalom.org 
+ NB: write the word "subscribe" in the subject line.

Archive of email reports:<https://mailman.gush-shalom.org/pipermail/gush-shalom/2004/thread.html#start>If you want to support Gush Shalom's activities you can 
send a cheque or cash, wrapped well in an extra piece 
of paper to: 

Gush Shalom
pob 3322
Tel-Aviv 61033
Israel

or ask us for charities in your country which receive 
donations on behalf of Gush Shalom

Please, add your email address where to send our 
confirmation of receipt. More official receipts at 
request only.