[GushShalom] "We won't know peace, as long as our neighbors do not" (Avnery)

[Gush Shalom (Israeli Peace Bloc)]

GUSH SHALOM - pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033  www.gush-shalom.org/

[] "We won't know peace, as long as our neighbors do not" 
[] The refusal epidemic continues to spread:
   For the first time, a regular service officer refuses service in OT

				~~~	
                                                                        
[] "We won't know peace, as long as our neighbors do not" 

[In the following Uri Avnery takes position against those who regard 
strife among Palestinians as something to be happy about, and clarifies 
why disintegration of the PA structure and the leadership of Arafat won't 
bring peace any closer.]

Hebrew at request &  soon at the site
òáøéú òì ôé á÷ùä àå á÷øåá áàúø

     I am writing this with an aching heart. I have postponed writing it 
as long as I could.
     In Jewish tradition, there is a searing phrase: "The Temple was not 
destroyed but for gratuitous hatred." It sums up the events in 
beleaguered Jerusalem, in the year 70 AD, when the town was surrounded by 
the Roman legions. While Titus' soldiers were maintaining the siege and 
the population was beginning to starve, inside the town ferocious battles 
took place between various factions of zealots, who killed each other and 
burnt each other's last stores of wheat.
     Something like this is now taking place in the Palestinian 
territories. While the occupation forces are tightening the siege and 
carrying out "targeted killings", battles between the Palestinians 
themselves have broken out, with militants shooting at each other, 
targeting leaders and burning headquarters.
     Occupation generals, politicians and commentators in Israel follow 
the events with glee or click their tongues sanctimoniously: "Didn't we 
tell you? The Palestinians can't rule themselves, there is no one to talk 
with, we have no partner for peace. When they are left to themselves, 
anarchy reigns." On many Israeli tongues the Greek word "chaos" 
(pronounced with an American accent) was rolling.
      Since the Sharon government is responsible for the present 
situation in Gaza in the first place, it resembles the son who kills both 
his parents and pleads in court: "Have mercy! I am an orphan!"
     Paradoxically, the Palestinian factions, of all people, seem to 
believe Sharon's announcement about his intention to leave Gaza. What is 
happening there is, first of all, a fight about the skin of the bear that 
has not yet been caught.
     Everybody talks about "reforms", a word dear to the Americans, but 
the battle is about power and control.
     Muhammad Dahlan's faction hopes to take possession of the Gaza Strip 
before Sharon's promised withdrawal. Sharon's people are open about their 
preference for this group. The Americans support them in order to suit 
Sharon, and the Egyptians support them to please the Americans.     
     The rival faction supports Mussa Arafat who was sent by his 
relative, Yasser Arafat, to control the security apparatus. He may not be 
the most popular appointee, but the leader in far-away Ramallah appointed 
his most trusted lieutenant in order to fend off the danger he fears 
most: that the Gaza Strip will cut itself off from the West Bank and 
become a kind of autonomous Bantustan under Israeli-American-Egyptian 
tutelage.
     This is what is happening on the surface. But the events also have 
deeper roots in the present Palestinian situation, which consists of an 
existential contradiction.
     On the one side, the Palestinian war of liberation is far from over. 
It is at its height. It can well be said that never has the very 
existence of the Palestinians - both as a nation and as individuals - 
been in greater danger than now.
     On the other hand, on the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip there has 
come into being a kind of mini-state that requires a state-like 
administration: security, economy, education, justice, welfare and so on.
     The surreal situation in Gaza reflects this contradiction: while 
Mussa Arafat, Muhammad Dahlan and the other Fatah leaders fight each 
other for control of the Palestinian Authority and its security organs, a 
brutal war is going on between the occupation forces and the Tanzim, 
Hamas and Jihad militants.
     The leader of the Palestinian war of liberation is Yasser Arafat. 
Among the Palestinians, no one contests that. He is the only person able 
to safeguard the unity of the Palestinian people. He is the only leader 
with a wide strategic grasp of all the geographic and functional aspects 
of the dispersed Palestinian people. He has the attributes necessary for 
a leader in such a situation: an uncontested personal authority, physical 
courage, the ability to make decisions and a talent for manoeuver. 
Palestinians call him the 'Father of the Nation" and compare him with 
George Washington, David Ben-Gurion and Nelson Mandela.
     The criticism of Arafat, prevalent mostly among the intellectual and 
political elite - concerns his functioning as the chief of the "mini-
state". Unlike the Prime Minister of Israel, Arafat is not suspected of 
personal corruption. He is being blamed for the fact that the Palestinian 
Authority is too much like the other Arab regimes, suffering from 
concentration of power, proliferation of security apparatuses, 
corruption, cronyism and the undue influence of big families.
     As a Palestinian member of parliament told me recently: "Arafat 
leads the national struggle, and all of us support him. But he neglects 
the domestic order, and against that we protest."
      However, Sharon is not fighting against Arafat to encourage him to  
delegate power or because he has seven different security formations (the 
United States has 15 intelligence agencies, four military services and an 
untold number of police organizations.) He is fighting against Arafat 
because his elimination will cause the disintegration of the Palestinian 
nation into splinters and thus clear the way for ethnic cleansing. Arafat 
is very much aware of this danger and, in comparison, all the diseases of 
the Palestinian Authority seem to him secondary.
     The strategy of Sharon and his generals is simple and brutal: to 
destroy the Palestinian Authority, turn life in the occupied territories 
into hell, disintegrate Palestinian society and drive the survivors from 
the country, not in one dramatic sweep (as in 1948) but in a slow, 
continuous, creeping process.
     Up to now, this has not succeeded. In spite of inhuman conditions, 
the Palestinian society has held on in a manner that arouses wonderment. 
The events of the last few weeks look to Sharon and the army chiefs like 
signs of collapse. I believe they are wrong and that the Palestinian 
society will draw back from the abyss.
     It is reasonable to expect that the prisoner in the Mukata'ah, who 
has already led his people out from so many existential crises, will do 
so again. I sincerely hope so, because Arafat is the only person who can 
make peace with us. We will know no peace, as long as our neighbors do 
not.  

[] The refusal epidemic continues to spread:
   For the first time, a regular service officer refuses service in the Territories

Translated from an article by Osnat Shustak, Ma'ariv 21/7/2004  - not found in the web 
version.

Second Lieutenant T. a 28-year battalion doctor and regular officer, refused to join his armoured 
battalion in an incursion into the Gaza Strip - for reasons of conscience. 
Several weeks ago, battalion 82 of the Seventh Regiment was sent on operation at the town of 
Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip, aimed at preventing the launch of Quasam rockets at the 
[Israeli town of] Sderot. 
T. had previously served in the Territories, and even took part this May in "Operation Rainbow" 
[including the demolition of houses and the shooting of tank shells at unarmed demonstrators] 
at the town of Rafah - though already then he expressed reservations about the army's activities 
in the Gaza Strip. This time he refused to take part in the operation, stating that taking part in 
the 
army's actions in the Territories would contradict the hippocratic oath he swore as a doctor, as 
well as standing in contrast to the army's own declared values and being detrimental to the state 
security. 
Many efforts were made to convince him to recant, but T. stuck to his refusal. Of no avail were 
the exhortations of his commanding officers, who stated that his job would be to take care of 
Palestinians as well as fellow soldiers, and that by refusing to join the operation he is putting 
soldiers' lives in danger. 
Finding him insistent, T.'s direct commander passed him on to the Seventh Regiment commander, 
who sentenced T. to 35 days' imprisonment for refusing an order during a military operation. He 
also told T.: "You are not worthy to be an officer". It seems that upon being released from his 
prison term T. will be discharged from service - though the army had paid for his medical studies 
in the expectation of getting years of service in return. 
"I regard this very gravely" said Defence Minister Mofaz on Army Radio."There are two highly 
detrimental aspects to this officer's actions. First, he refused to take part in an action very vit
al to 
the security of Israel's citizens, in order to prevent the shooting of rockets at Sderot and its 
environs. Also, this officer who is a doctor was unwilling to help soldiers who might be hurt, 
which is trampling upon the hippocratic oath. I think that the way his commanders dealt with this 
case is the way to deal with refusers."
On the other hand, David Zonshein of the "Courage to Refuse" movement praised the doctor's 
action: "It is not 'an extremist act',  it is a very Zionist act. It is important for the public to
 know 
that there are officers who want to serve and love their country, but are opposed to the 
enormous damage which service in the country is doing to the country. This is the first time that 
a regular service officer is refusing service in the Territories. I hope and believe that his act h
as 
broken a fissure in the consensus and that more officers will now be willing to act for what they 
believe in - even if they have to pay a personal price".

[N.B. Ma'ariv did not mention to its readers that the Beit Hanoun operation in which Dr. T. 
refused to take part was about a still ongoing campaign of destruction of Palestinian fields, 
hothouses and orange groves, demolition of houses and the imposition of a weeks-long siege on 
Beit Hanoun's 20,000 inhabitants. ]

# Truth against Truth - opposite views on the history of the conflict
  in 101 steps 

Hebrew / òáøéú
http://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Heb.pdf

English
http://www.gush-shalom.org/Docs/Truth_Eng.pdf


# Boycott List of Settlement Products (newly updated)
  Now also with list of settlements
   
Hebrew / òáøéú
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boycheb.htm

English
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boyceng.htm

--
http://www.gush-shalom.org/ (òáøéú/Hebrew)
http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html (English)
http://www.gush-shalom.org/arabic/index.html (selected articles in Arabic)

with
\\photos of recent actions 
\\the weekly Gush Shalom ad 
\\the columns of Uri Avnery 
\\Gush Shalom's history & action chronicle  
\\position papers & analysis (in "documents")
\\and a lot more

N.B.: 
On the Gush Shalom website links for 
Articles and documents in German, French and Spanish

In order to receive Gush Shalom's Hebrew-language 
press releases mail to:
gush-shalom-heb-request at mailman.gush-shalom.org 
+ NB: write the word "subscribe" in the subject line.

Archive of email reports:
https://mailman.gush-shalom.org/pipermail/gush-
shalom/2004/thread.html#start

If you want to support Gush Shalom's activities you can 
send a cheque or cash, wrapped well in an extra piece 
of paper to: 

Gush Shalom
pob 3322
Tel-Aviv 61033
Israel

or ask us for charities in your country which receive 
donations on behalf of Gush Shalom

Please, add your email address where to send our 
confirmation of receipt. More official receipts at 
request only.